Homework 6
Exercise: Give an example of each of the following, or prove that it cannot exist.
- A sequence that contains subsequences which converge to every point in the infinite set
- A sequence that contains subsequences converging to every point in the interval
- A sequence which has a bounded subsequence, but no convergent subsequence.
Proof.
- You can use the example for (b). Also there is a cheap way to get the example. For instance, . Each time, you go a bit further and rewind.
- Listing the rationals in suffices. For instance, .
- It is not possible in . Because the bounded subsequence would have a convergent sub-subsequence. However, in a more general setting, it is possible. Think of equipped with the discrete metric and . Then itself is bounded and it doesn't have any convergent subsequences. Also you may use the examples in Problem 3.
Exercise: Find all subsequential limits of the sequence defined by
Proof. The odd-numbered terms converge to and the even-numbered terms converge to .
Exercise: For each of the following metric spaces, given an example of a Cauchy sequence which does not converge. In each case, assume .
Proof.
- Listing rationals approaching suffices. For instance, .
- Listing irrationals approaching $$ suffices. For instance, .
- Any sequence converging to suffices. For instance, .
Exercise: Suppose that is a Cauchy sequence in a metric space , and some subsequence of converges to . Prove that then the full sequence converges to . That is, .
Proof. For any , there is some 'good' subsequence of in which every element is in . This is because some subsequence converges to , so its tail must lie in the interval above. On the other hand, since is Cauchy, there is such that if then . Let be one of the elements in the 'good' subsequence. Then for all , . That is, .
Exercise: Suppose and are Cauchy sequences in with metric .
- Prove that the sequence is Cauchy.
- Prove that the sequence is Cauchy.
Proof.
- For every there is a positive integer with the following property: If and , then , and if and , then . Now let . Then for any , we have . This shows that is Cauchy.
- First we claim that is bounded. This is because is Cauchy, so there is , such that for any , . Let . Then is a bound for . Also we can find a bound, say , for . Then pick any . Follow the argument used in (a), for every , we can find such that if , then and . Hence if , then d(a_nb_n, a_mb_m)\leq d(a_nb_n, a_mb_n)+d(a_mb_n, a_mb_m)$$=|b_n|d(a_n,a_m)+|a_m|d(b_n.b_m)< B\times\frac{\epsilon}{2M}+A\times\frac{\epsilon}{2M}<\epsilon. This tells us that is Cauchy.