Skip to main content

Homework 6

Exercise: Give an example of each of the following, or prove that it cannot exist.

  1. A sequence that contains subsequences which converge to every point in the infinite set {1/n:nN}\{1/n: n\in\mathbb{N}\}
  2. A sequence that contains subsequences converging to every point in the interval [0,1][0,1]
  3. A sequence which has a bounded subsequence, but no convergent subsequence.

Proof.

  1. You can use the example for (b). Also there is a cheap way to get the example. For instance, 1/1,1/1,1/2,1/1,1/2,1/3,1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,1/5,1/1, 1/1, 1/2, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, \ldots. Each time, you go a bit further and rewind.
  2. Listing the rationals in [0,1][0,1] suffices. For instance, 0,1,1/2,1/3,2/3,1/4,2/4,3/4,0, 1, 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, \ldots.
  3. It is not possible in Rk\mathbb{R}^k. Because the bounded subsequence would have a convergent sub-subsequence. However, in a more general setting, it is possible. Think of N\mathbb{N} equipped with the discrete metric and an=na_n = n. Then {an}\{a_n\} itself is bounded and it doesn't have any convergent subsequences. Also you may use the examples in Problem 3.

Exercise: Find all subsequential limits of the sequence {sn}\{s_n\} defined by

s1=0;s2n=s2n12;s2n+1=12+s2n.s_1=0; s_{2n}=\frac{s_{2n-1}}{2}; s_{2n+1}=\frac{1}{2}+s_{2n}.

Proof. The odd-numbered terms converge to 11 and the even-numbered terms converge to 1/21/2.

Exercise: For each of the following metric spaces, given an example of a Cauchy sequence which does not converge. In each case, assume d(x,y)=xyd(x,y)=|x-y|.

  1. X=QX=\mathbb{Q}
  2. X=R\QX=\mathbb{R}\backslash\mathbb{Q}
  3. X=(1,1)X=(-1,1)

Proof.

  1. Listing rationals approaching π\pi suffices. For instance, 3,3.1,3.14,3.141,3.1415,3, 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, 3.1415, \ldots.
  2. Listing irrationals approaching $$ suffices. For instance, π1,π2,π3,\frac{\pi}{1}, \frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{3}, \ldots.
  3. Any sequence converging to 1-1 suffices. For instance, 1+11,1+12,1+13,-1+\frac{1}{1}, -1+\frac{1}{2}, -1+\frac{1}{3}, \ldots.

Exercise: Suppose that {pn}\{p_n\} is a Cauchy sequence in a metric space XX, and some subsequence of {pn}\{p_n\} converges to pXp\in X. Prove that then the full sequence converges to pp. That is, limnpn=p\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}p_n=p.

Proof. For any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there is some 'good' subsequence of {pn}\{p_n\} in which every element is in (pϵ/2,p+ϵ/2)(p-\epsilon/2, p+\epsilon/2). This is because some subsequence converges to pp, so its tail must lie in the interval above. On the other hand, since {pn}\{p_n\} is Cauchy, there is NN such that if m,nNm,n\geq N then d(pm,pn)<ϵ/2d(p_m, p_n)<\epsilon/2. Let pnp_n be one of the elements in the 'good' subsequence. Then for all mNm\geq N, d(pm,p)d(pm,pn)+d(pn,p)<ϵ/2+ϵ/2=ϵd(p_m,p)\leq d(p_m,p_n)+d(p_n,p)<\epsilon/2+\epsilon/2=\epsilon. That is, limnpn=p\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}p_n=p.

Exercise: Suppose {an}\{a_n\} and {bn}\{b_n\} are Cauchy sequences in R\mathbb{R} with metric d(x,y)=xyd(x,y)=|x-y|.

  1. Prove that the sequence {an+bn}\{a_n+b_n\} is Cauchy.
  2. Prove that the sequence {anbn}\{a_n b_n\} is Cauchy.

Proof.

  1. For every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 there is a positive integer N1,N2NN_1, N_2\in\mathbb{N} with the following property: If nN1n\geq N_1 and mN1m\geq N_1, then d(an,am)<ϵ/2d(a_n, a_m)<\epsilon/2, and if nN2n\geq N_2 and mN2m\geq N_2, then d(bn,bm)<ϵ/2d(b_n, b_m)<\epsilon/2. Now let N=max(N1,N2)N=\max(N_1, N_2). Then for any n,mNn, m\geq N, we have d(an+bn,am+bm)d(an,am)+d(bn,bm)<ϵd(a_n+b_n,a_m+b_m)\leq d(a_n,a_m)+d(b_n,b_m)<\epsilon. This shows that {an+bn}\{a_n+b_n\} is Cauchy.
  2. First we claim that {an}\{a_n\} is bounded. This is because {an}\{a_n\} is Cauchy, so there is NN, such that for any nNn\geq N, d(an,aN)<1d(a_n, a_N)<1. Let A=max(a1,a2,,aN)+1A=\max(|a_1|, |a_2|, \ldots, |a_N|)+1. Then AA is a bound for {an}\{a_n\}. Also we can find a bound, say BB, for {bn}\{b_n\}. Then pick any M>A,BM>A,B. Follow the argument used in (a), for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we can find NN such that if n,mNn, m\geq N, then d(an,am)<ϵ2Md(a_n, a_m)<\frac{\epsilon}{2M} and d(an,am)<ϵ2Md(a_n, a_m)<\frac{\epsilon}{2M}. Hence if n,mNn,m\geq N, then d(a_nb_n, a_mb_m)\leq d(a_nb_n, a_mb_n)+d(a_mb_n, a_mb_m)$$=|b_n|d(a_n,a_m)+|a_m|d(b_n.b_m)< B\times\frac{\epsilon}{2M}+A\times\frac{\epsilon}{2M}<\epsilon. This tells us that {anbn}\{a_nb_n\} is Cauchy.